Television Pluralism and Diversity and the European Commission’s Competition Policy – The Western European Experience
نویسنده
چکیده
This article assesses the question of media concentration in the European Union (EU) in the context of the regulatory approaches taken by the Member States and the EU. It argues, despite common perceptions that the EU’s approach to protecting media pluralism is governed by a purely market approach, it is also entrenched in a significant public interest basis. It argues that media concentration is increasing due to the weakening of a commitment as to the importance placed on the protection of media pluralism by the Member States. Subsequently national governments are supporting national champions and removing regulatory barriers for company growth in order to protect their own market players while at the same time enabling national companies to exploit even greater economies of scale by expanding into neighbouring countries both within the EU and outside of the area. At the same time the growth of the European Commission (EC) as a key regulator in the area of competition policy at the Community level has reshaped the scope of national regulation in this field. In this respect, a policy at the EU level has been to employ competition policy in order to support European Champions that are able to exploit greater size on the global market, but also to protect media pluralism on a national level by allowing media companies to expand in the different media markets across the common market zone. These contrasting policy trajectories will be discussed by reviewing the ECs media related decisions, and the article will conclude that although individual Member States retain the right to enforce media concentration regulations under the merger regulation there appears to be little will on behalf of many of the major
منابع مشابه
Challenges and Prospects of European Railways
In the present paper, challenges and prospects of the European railways, along with a proposal for a new strategy policy and specific measures are presented. The declining course of European railways concerning traffic and revenues is first analyzed. Conditions to introduce intra - modal competition are surveyed, among them separation of infrastructure fro...
متن کاملIs It More Important to Address the Issue of Patient Mobility or to Guarantee Universal Health Coverage in Europe?; Comment on “Regional Incentives and Patient Cross-Border Mobility: Evidence From the Italian Experience”
This paper discusses whether European institutions should devote so much attention and funding to cross-border healthcare or they should instead prioritise guaranteeing universal health coverage (UHC), inequalities and tackling the effects of austerity measures. The paper argues through providing the evidence in both areas of research, that the priority at European level from a public health an...
متن کاملPromoting Diversity and Pluralism in Contemporary Communication Policies in the United States and the United Kingdom
Recent revisions of media regulation and legislation have emphasized diversity and pluralism as key objectives. Both the Federal Communication Commission’s rewriting of broadcasting ownership rules in 2003 and the United Kingdom government’s 2003 Communications Act insist that the public interest is best met through providing a dynamic, market-led approach to communications regulation. This art...
متن کاملکالبد شکافی سیاست خارجی و مواضع بازیگران معارض غربی در جنگ 33 روزه لبنان
With the beginning of the 33-day war against Lebanon, global and regional actors adopted different orientations and stances towards it according to their interests. The efforts of western governments and the U.S. as the super powers of the world, in support of Isreal and against Hizbullah, are obvious manifestations of the issues of this war. The present paper is aimed at explaining and an...
متن کاملReaching Outside the Comfort Zone: Realising the FCTC’s Potential for Public Health Governance and Regulation in the European Union; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments – What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”
In their paper, Nikogosian and Kickbusch show how the effects of the adoption by the World Health Organization (WHO) of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) and its first Protocol extend beyond tobacco control and contribute to public health governance more broadly, by revealing new processes, institutions and instruments. While there are certainly good reasons to be optimisti...
متن کامل